Citroen C5 2001 vs Subaru Outback 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 209 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 282 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 99 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 10.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C5 consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 720 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
1430 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
1040 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.58 m | |
Citroen C5 is larger, but lower. Citroen C5 is 4 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 527 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1649 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`085 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |