Citroen C5 2012 vs Jaguar XF 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Citroen C5) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Jaguar XF) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 126 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 8.1 | |
|
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1570 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1730 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen C5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is smaller. Citroen C5 is 18 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 540 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Citroen C5 has 101 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`062 kg | 2`315 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`525 kg | 1`660 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 537 kg | 655 kg | |
| Citroen C5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Jaguar XF. Therefore, Jaguar XF is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |