Citroen C5 2001 vs Mazda 6 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Citroen C5 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda 6 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.7 - 2.9 | 1.8 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 207 HP | 120 - 166 HP | |
Torque: | 160 - 317 NM | 165 - 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | 9.2 - 12.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 10.3 | 6.4 - 10.5 | |
Citroen C5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Citroen C5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
Citroen C5 is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C5 is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 505 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1712 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 1.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Citroen C5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`450 | ~ 1`959 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |