Citroen C5 2001 vs Mazda 3 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.7 - 2.9 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 207 HP | 105 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 317 NM | 145 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | 6.1 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 10.3 | 4.3 - 9.6 | |
|
Citroen C5 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Citroen C5 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is larger. Citroen C5 is 28 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Citroen C5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`450 | ~ 1`864 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |