Citroen C5 2001 vs Ford Mondeo 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.7 - 2.9 | 1.8 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 207 HP | 90 - 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 317 NM | 165 - 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 13.1 seconds | 7.4 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 10.2 | 5.7 - 10.7 | |
|
Citroen C5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, Citroen C5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C5 is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C5 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Citroen C5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`478 | ~ 1`939 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |