Citroen C5 2000 vs Citroen C5 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.7 - 2.9 | 1.6 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 207 HP | 110 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 317 NM | 160 - 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 13.1 seconds | 8.5 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 10.2 | 5.4 - 10.0 | |
|
Citroen C5 2000 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C5 2004. On average, Citroen C5 2000 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5 2004. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Citroen C5 2000 is 13 cm shorter than the Citroen C5 2004, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1315 litres | |
| Citroen C5 2000 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5 2004. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 2000 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Citroen C5 2004, which means Citroen C5 2000 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`912 | ~ 2`001 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |