Citroen C5 2001 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.7 - 2.9 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 207 HP | 115 - 223 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 317 NM | 157 - 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 13.1 seconds | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 10.2 | 6.9 - 10.5 | |
|
Citroen C5 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler PT Cruiser. On average, Citroen C5 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is larger, but lower. Citroen C5 is 30 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Citroen C5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`478 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |