Chrysler Voyager 1988 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 228 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 102 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 11.5 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is smaller. Chrysler Voyager is 31 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`500 kg | 2`760 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |