Chrysler Voyager 1991 vs Mercedes Vito 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 241 NM | 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes Vito is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 24 HP less power than Mercedes Vito, but torque is 4 NM more than Mercedes Vito. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 13.8 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes Vito gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is smaller. Chrysler Voyager is 14 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes Vito. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |