Chrysler Voyager 1994 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 43 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.6 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 25 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1498 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 2.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |