Chrysler Voyager 1991 vs Mercedes Vito 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes Vito is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 33 HP less power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Mercedes Vito. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 13.8 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is smaller. Chrysler Voyager is 14 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes Vito. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |