Chrysler Voyager 1991 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 22 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Despite less power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 12.1 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 38 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 328 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3990 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |