Chrysler Voyager 1994 vs Mercedes Vito 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes Vito is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 44 HP less power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Mercedes Vito. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 11.6 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is smaller. Chrysler Voyager is 14 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes Vito. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |