Chrysler Voyager 1994 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 19 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.7 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 38 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 3990 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3990 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |