Chrysler Voyager 1994 vs Toyota Previa 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Previa is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 57 HP less power than Toyota Previa, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Toyota Previa. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.5 | |
| Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Previa 2000 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 23 cm shorter than the Toyota Previa, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |