Chrysler Voyager 1991 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 99 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 179 NM | 176 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 34 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, but torque is 3 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.6 | |
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 25 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 676 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1498 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 2.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`745 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |