Chrysler Voyager 1991 vs Toyota Previa 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Previa is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 57 HP less power than Toyota Previa, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Toyota Previa. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Previa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Previa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.77 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 23 cm shorter than the Toyota Previa, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |