Chrysler Voyager 1994 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 118 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 260 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 36 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 88 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 8.1 | |
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.66 m | |
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 25 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 676 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1498 litres | |
Chrysler Voyager has 5 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 2.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |