Chrysler Voyager 1994 vs Toyota Previa 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 2 HP more power than Toyota Previa, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota Previa. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Previa is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Previa might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Previa 2001 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Previa 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 23 cm shorter than the Toyota Previa, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
|
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler Voyager has 176 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Previa. The Toyota Previa may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |