Chrysler Voyager 1992 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 4 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 20 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2001: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
|
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Voyager has 261 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |