Chrysler Voyager 2007 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 12 HP less power than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 15 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler Voyager has 50 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford Galaxy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |