Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

 
Chrysler Voyager
2004 - 2006
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.8 Diesel2.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 149 HP204 HP
Torque: 360 NM265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.4 seconds
Chrysler Voyager engine produces 55 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 95 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.411.9
Real fuel consumption: 9.5 l/100km12.8 l/100km
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 890 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
1130 km on highway760 km on highway
780 km with real consumption540 km with real consumption
Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.81 m4.63 m
Width: 2.00 m1.81 m
Height: 1.75 m1.73 m
Chrysler Voyager is larger.
Chrysler Voyager is 18 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6002`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 18002600
Rating in user reviews: 8.1/10 6.1/10
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Voyager has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv