Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 12 HP less power than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 15 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford Galaxy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |