Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Chrysler Voyager) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Galaxy) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 12 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, but torque is 152 NM more than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 15 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2325 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`600 kg | 2`415 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford Galaxy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |