Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Chrysler Voyager) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Galaxy) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 12 HP less power than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 15 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford Galaxy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |