Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 14 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 5.14 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 33 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 638 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3296 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |