Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Toyota Sienna 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 301 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 66 HP less power than Toyota Sienna, but torque is 59 NM more than Toyota Sienna. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 10.7 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Sienna, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 27 cm shorter than the Toyota Sienna, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4217 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |