Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Toyota Avensis Verso 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 33 HP more power than Toyota Avensis Verso, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Toyota Avensis Verso. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Avensis Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Avensis Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Avensis Verso 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Avensis Verso 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 12 cm longer than the Toyota Avensis Verso, 24 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 282 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 282 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2422 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Avensis Verso, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Toyota Avensis Verso has
| |