Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Renault Grand Espace 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 1 HP less power than Renault Grand Espace, but torque is 20 NM more than Renault Grand Espace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.6 | |
|
The Renault Grand Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Espace 2006 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 5 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Espace, 14 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Espace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Renault Grand Espace has
| |