Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Kia Carnival 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 5 HP more power than Kia Carnival, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Kia Carnival. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Used also on Hyundai Terracan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 12 cm shorter than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 302 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.5 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Chrysler Voyager has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Carnival has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Chrysler Voyager, so Chrysler Voyager quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |