Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Kia Carnival 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 149 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 324 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Chrysler Voyager engine produces 19 HP more power than Kia Carnival, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Kia Carnival. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.93 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
Chrysler Voyager is 12 cm shorter than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 302 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.5 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`550 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Chrysler Voyager has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Carnival has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Chrysler Voyager, so Chrysler Voyager quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |