Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Ford S-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 19 HP more power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford S-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford S-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford S-Max engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford Focus, Ford Galaxy, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford S-Max might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 4 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, 15 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 854 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 854 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |