Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, but Chrysler Voyager torque is 8 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.5 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 15 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 308 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford Galaxy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |