Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 23 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Despite less power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 5.14 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 33 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 638 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3296 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |