Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Kia Carnival 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 144 HP | |
Torque: | 312 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 4 HP less power than Kia Carnival, but torque is 2 NM more than Kia Carnival. Despite less power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.2 | |
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.93 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
Chrysler Voyager is 12 cm shorter than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 302 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.5 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`665 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Chrysler Voyager has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Carnival has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Chrysler Voyager, so Chrysler Voyager quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |