Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Mitsubishi Grandis 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 218 NM | 217 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Grandis is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 18 HP less power than Mitsubishi Grandis, but torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi Grandis. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.4 | |
The Mitsubishi Grandis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Grandis, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Grandis, 20 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 9 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 320 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 320 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 440 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1545 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Grandis, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`250 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Mitsubishi Grandis has
| |