Chrysler Voyager 2001 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chrysler Voyager, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.7/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |