Chrysler Voyager 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Chrysler Voyager) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Space Wagon) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, but torque is 87 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 20 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 22 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 240 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`600 kg | 2`180 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.7/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |