Chrysler Voyager 2001 vs Mercedes Vito 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 19.4 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 52 HP more power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 92 NM more than Mercedes Vito. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | no data | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
| |