Chrysler Voyager 2001 vs Ford Galaxy 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 17.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 50 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 72 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 16 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford Galaxy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chrysler Voyager, so Ford Galaxy quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.7/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |