Chrysler Voyager 2001 vs Mazda MPV 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 4 HP more power than Mazda MPV, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Mazda MPV. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda MPV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager and Mazda MPV are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 294 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 294 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2745 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda MPV. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`395 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |