Chrysler Voyager 2001 vs Hyundai H1 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 41 HP more power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 87 NM more than Hyundai H1. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Voyager is 11 cm longer than the Hyundai H1, 18 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 3295 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`600 kg | 2`550 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
| |