Chrysler Voyager 2001 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 138 HP | |
Torque: | 312 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 2 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
930 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 33 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 17 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.7/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |