Chrysler Voyager 2001 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 42 HP more power than Skoda Roomster, but torque is 14 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 705 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 5.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Chrysler Voyager 2001 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Voyager 2001 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 60 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 32 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1780 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1 metres more than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |