Chrysler Voyager 1999 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 48 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 11.9 | |
| Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 395 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |