Chrysler Voyager 1999 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 262 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 32 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.1 | |
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.58 m | |
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 23 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 22 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 16 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 212 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 212 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1714 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`900 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |