Chrysler Voyager 1999 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 262 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 1 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 6.3 | |
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
Chrysler Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Voyager is 10 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |