Chrysler Voyager 1999 vs Seat Alhambra 2000

 
Chrysler Voyager
1999 - 2001
Seat Alhambra
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 114 HP115 HP
Torque: 262 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.8 seconds13.7 seconds
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving.
Chrysler Voyager engine produces 1 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.26.3
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chrysler Voyager consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 435 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.63 m
Width: 1.92 m1.81 m
Height: 1.74 m1.76 m
Chrysler Voyager is larger, but slightly lower.
Chrysler Voyager is 10 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data256 litres
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6002`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8002600
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Voyager has
  • lower price
Seat Alhambra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv