Chrysler Voyager 1999 vs Renault Espace 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 1 HP less power than Renault Espace, but torque is 12 NM more than Renault Espace. Despite less power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.0 | |
|
The Renault Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Voyager is 21 cm longer than the Renault Espace, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 275 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2850 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Espace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Renault Espace has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Espace, so Renault Espace quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Renault Espace has
| |