Chrysler Voyager 1999 vs Mazda MPV 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 8 HP less power than Mazda MPV, but torque is 87 NM more than Mazda MPV. Despite less power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.1 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda MPV engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda MPV, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 294 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 294 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda MPV. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |