Chrysler Voyager 1996 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 7 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler PT Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 34 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 21 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 32 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Chrysler PT Cruiser has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Chrysler PT Cruiser, so Chrysler PT Cruiser quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |