Chrysler Voyager 1996 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 19 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, but torque is 88 NM more than Chrysler Neon. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 37 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 21 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 37 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |