Chrysler Voyager 1999 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 151 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 4 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 34 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`525 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
| |